Webinar: From USA to Europe - Accelerating Your Path to the Medical Device Market

Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil
An EU flag on a pole flies between two US flags against a blue sky.

Already have FDA marketing authorisation and now setting your sights on Europe?

Join our webinar to learn how to transform your U.S. regulatory work into a compliant EU MDR submission, speeding up your time to market and reducing the cost of Notified Body reviews.

From USA to Europe: Accelerating Your Path to the Medical Device Market
📅 Date: Tuesday, 9th December 2025
🕒 Time: 4:00 pm UTC / 11:00 am ET / 8:00 am PT
🔗 Register: Our MS Teams event page

Our team has helped dozens of U.S. manufacturers successfully transition to the European market. We are proud of our 100% acceptance rate from Notified Bodies across all our submissions. Join us as we share:

  • The key differences between FDA 510(k) and MDR equivalence requirements
  • How to adapt your existing clinical evidence and integrate PMCF requirements
  • Strategies for leveraging prior documentation to fast-track EU MDR approval

Your Roadmap to European Market Success

For medical device manufacturers based in the US, gaining FDA marketing authorisation is a major milestone. Generally, medical device manufacturers rarely limit themselves to a single market, with global expansion a key part of a long-term growth strategy. However, many assume that European regulatory expectations require an entirely separate development effort, but in reality, there’s substantial overlap in evidence, documentation, and technical strategy.

With a clear roadmap, you can avoid redundant testing, streamline your submission, and minimise costly Notified Body review cycles.

  1. Identify EU MDR classification
  2. Perform a Gap analysis
  3. Engage a notified body
  4. Conformity assessment
  5. Conduct clinical evaluation and risk management
  6. Align with EU-MDR Technical Documentation
  7. Develop PMS
  8. Submit for notified body review and obtain a CE mark
  9. Register in EUDAMED and maintain compliance

Understanding the Key Differences between FDA and EU MDR

Although ensuring device safety and performance is the ultimate goal of both the FDA and EU MDR frameworks, there are significant differences in the evidence expectations, documentation structure, and post-market obligations, which differ substantially. The MDR places greater emphasis on clinical evidence, risk management integration, and ongoing post-market performance evaluation, making it essential for FDA-approved companies to carefully adapt their U.S. regulatory data and systems for Europe.

Key areas of overlap

A major advantage of having FDA clearance or approval is that much of your existing documentation can be repurposed for EU MDR compliance. However, some new MDR-specific documents will be required to address the European regulatory focus on clinical evaluation, safety, and post-market performance.

Documents that can be repurposed

  • Device description and specification
  • Instructions for Use (IFU)
  • Preclinical testing – Biocompatibility, EMC, Invitro + animal testing, Physical, Chemical, Microbiological tests, Software V&V, Stability & Shelf-life test
  • Labelling & Packaging
  • Substantial equivalence (if equivalence route)

New MDR documents required

  • Clinical Evaluation Documents (CEP, CER & SOTA)
  • Device manufacturing and information
  • General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs)
  • Standards and common specifications
  • Declaration of Conformity (DoC)
  • PMCF, PMS, PSUR
  • Risk Management per ISO 14971 – Characteristics related to safety, Criteria for risk acceptability, Evaluation of overall residual risk, Risk control, RMP, RMR, PHA

By strategically repurposing and aligning your existing data, you can reduce redundancy, streamline your submission, and cut both time and costs during Notified Body review.

Our webinar: Accelerating Your European Market Entry

Transitioning from FDA to MDR compliance doesn’t have to be difficult. With expert guidance and a structured approach, U.S. manufacturers can efficiently adapt their data, close any clinical or technical gaps, and achieve successful Notified Body approval.

Places are still available, so register to join our webinar here

Related articles

  1. A US-style 'changes ahead' warning road sign.

    Device Modifications: When a Simple Change Becomes a Regulatory Nightmare

    As regulatory consultants we understand how minor modifications to a device can often cause disproportionate disruption.

    Kamiya Crabtree Kamiya Crabtree Regulatory Medical Writer
  2. Webinar announcement poster.

    Webinar: Regulatory & Cybersecurity Essentials for medical device software and AI-enabled devices

    Our webinar with Cyber Alchemy addressed bringing AI-enabled medical devices to market with both the right regulatory and cybersecurity foundations.

    Shen May Khoo Shen May Khoo Regulatory Project Lead
  3. A simple jigsaw with iconography representing growth printed on it.

    Leveraging Post-Market Surveillance Data for Continuous Improvement

    PMS isn’t just about compliance, it’s an opportunity for improvement, enhance patient safety & innovate.

    Shen May Khoo Shen May Khoo Regulatory Project Lead
  4. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. W. Brambley.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: CEP Strategy & CER Structure

    Part 4 - We explore how these guide reviewers through the evidence that supports safey, performance, and conformity.

    Dr Will Brambley Dr Will Brambley Lead Medical Writer
  5. A checklist being ticket-off in pen.

    The Critical Role of Pre-Submission Reviews in EU MDR Clinical Evaluations

    Ensuring your CER is robust and aligned with current standards is critical. How much Clinical Evidence is enough?

    Sandra Gopinath Sandra Gopinath Chief Regulatory Officer
  6. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. W. Brambley.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: The State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Literature Review

    Part 3 - This is core of a sucessful submission. Will demystifies the process and explains how it supports clinical evaluation.

    Dr Will Brambley Dr Will Brambley Lead Medical Writer
  7. An orange tabletop with wooden question mark blocks laid upon it.

    Regulatory Update: EU Borderline & Classification Manual for medical devices v4

    New examples sharpen the distinction between medical devices and other product categories, such as pharmacologically active substances and aesthetic-only products.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  8. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. P. Boxall.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: Clinical Evaluation in Context

    Part 2 - A clinical evaluation demonstrates that a device is safe and effective, but achieving this requires more than simply compiling studies.

    Dr Peter Boxall Dr Peter Boxall Lead Medical Writer
  9. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. P. Hercock.

    Introducing Our Guide to Clinical Evaluation Video Series: Building Strong Submissions Under MDR

    First of a five-part series of step-by-step guides.

    Dr Paul Hercock Dr Paul Hercock Chief Executive Officer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP