Still racing to achieve MDR compliance? A transition period update

Sandra Gopinath
Racing to achieve MDR compliance

At the EPSCO Board meeting on December 9, 2022, the EU Health Minister urged the European Commission to extend the transition period for the Medical Device Regulation. The proposal was under consideration of the European Parliament and the Council.

On January 6th 2023, the EU commission has adopted the proposal to extend the transition rules of Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) to allow more time for certification and to alleviate the foreseeable shortage of medical devices.

Status quo

Under transitional arrangements, medical devices are allowed to enter the EU market under CE certifications issued according to Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) or 90/385/EEC (AIMDD). The previously extended MDR transition time was due to end on 26 May 2024, meaning that after this time devices would require a recertification under MDR.

Numerous industry stakeholders and key opinion leaders had expressed concerns in recent months that this deadline is unrealistic and that its implementation could have an impact on the continuous availability of different medical devices required by patients and healthcare providers in the EU.

Moreover, opinions were that the suggested transitional time range could jeopardise research and innovation in addition to availability issues by delaying access to cutting-edge medical devices in EU nations.

In addition to the strong backlash from stakeholders, limitations in Notified Body capacity was also a significant factor in calls for an extension to the transition period.

The proposal

In order to address the concerns and mitigate foreseeable risks associated with device shortage, the EU commission proposed a longer transition period with new deadlines depending on the medical device’s risk class.

It is worth noting that the proposal does not alter any of the existing performance and safety standards outlined in the Medical Device Regulation 2017/745. It only amends the transitional provisions to provide additional time to transfer from the formerly applicable norms.

Key elements of the proposal:

The transition periods for medical devices authorised under Directive 93/42/EEC (Medical Device Directive) will now last until 31 December 2027 for high risk (Class III and IIb) devices, until 31 December 2028 for medium and low risk (Class IIa and I) devices and until 26 May 2026 for class III implantable custom-made devices.

It is important to note that these extensions are subject to certain conditions. They are only applicable to devices:

  1. that are “safe”, that do not pose an unacceptable risk to health & safety
  2. which have not undergone any significant changes in its intended purpose or design
  3. those for which manufacturers have already taken steps to transition to the rules provided by MDR

In case of custom-made devices, the transition period is also subject to the application of the manufacturer for a conformity assessment of the device before 26 May 2024.

Elimination of the "sell-off" date of 26 May 2025 that is currently established in the Medical Device Regulation. The "sell-off" date designates the time after which products that have already been sold and are still on the market should be withdrawn.

Removing the “sell-off” date will, it is argued, prevent safe medical devices from being removed from the market.

What this means

While it will be warmly welcomed by many, the proposal to delay the transitional period now has to be approved by the European Parliament and the Council through an expedited co-decision process. For this reason, manufacturers are still encouraged to continue working towards compliance with the MDR as soon as possible, as the extension is not a “free pass”.

Notified Bodies will be still monitoring and auditing compliance during the extension period, and as outlined above, the transition period only applies to devices “for which manufacturers have already taken steps to transition to the rules provided by MDR.” Additionally, for Class III devices, the transition period is subject to the application of the manufacturer for a conformity assessment before 26 May 2024.

So, whether approved by the European Parliament and Council or not, it’s not time to forget about MDR certification. It may, however, take off some of the pressure.

Please contact us if you have any questions about this article or would like to discuss our products and services in more detail.

Related articles

  1. US and EU flags on poles alongside each other.

    Clinical Evidence under EU MDR: Leveraging FDA Clinical Data to Streamline EU MDR Compliance

    FDA approval alone is not sufficient for European market access - a theme we explore futher in this article and the accompanying webinar.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  2. An AI-generated image of 3 people in an office in front of a whiteboard with the words 'Medical Device Market Entry Strategy' written above a world map.

    EU MDR & NHS DTAC Cybersecurity Requirements for UK Market Entry

    This guest article from our partner Cyber Alchemy shows you how to build cybersecurity evidence for the EU MDR and NHS DTAC.

    Luke Hill Luke Hill Co-Founder of Cyber Alchemy
  3. An illustration showing a GPS-driven navigation route superimposed upon someone using a laptop.

    Where to Launch First? A MedTech Founder's Regulatory Roadmap to the EU, UK and US

    Cyber Alchemy × Mantra Systems — Episode 1: All three markets operate under different regulatory systems and place different demands on manufacturers.

    Ronghe Xu Ronghe Xu Regulatory Medical Writer & Strategic BD Lead China
  4. A woman uses an inhaler.

    Navigating EU MDR Article 117: A Practical Guide to Drug-Device Combination Product Submissions

    Implementation of the EU MDR 2017/745 has brought significant changes.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  5. Collage art showing a pair of binoculars, an analogy for surveillance.

    How EU MDR Post Market Surveillance differs from FDA post-market expectations

    We compare manufacturer-specific post-market obligations across both regulatory systems.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  6. An arrow arcs from the US over to Europe.

    How EU device classification differs from the US - Are you Prepared?

    Did you know an FDA Class II medical device could be immediately considered as a high-risk Class III device under European Union regulations?

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer
  7. A magnifying glass inspecting a number of wooden cubes with question marks upon them laid upon a blue table. The wooden cube under the magnifying glass has a lightbulb painted on it.

    Fixing the MDR and IVDR? The Commission’s Proposed Amendments and What They Mean for Manufacturers

    Exploring the key elements of this proposal.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  8. Two arms point at a sign and hold a question mark, in an abstract pop-art style.

    Regulatory Reset? The EU’s Proposed Changes to MDR and IVDR Explained

    Changes published in December 2025 aim to streamline EU medical device and in vitro diagnostics. We explain who is impacted and how.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  9. A pair of glasses rests on an eye test chart.

    Did You Know Your Glasses Were a Medical Device? A Regulatory Guide for Manufacturers

    The importance of correct classification and our recommended path to avoid common ophthalmic device 'gotchas'.

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP