Leveraging Post-Market Surveillance Data for Continuous Improvement

Shen May Khoo
A simple jigsaw with iconography representing growth printed on it.

The European Union’s Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) has ushered in a new era of accountability and transparency for medical device manufacturers. One of its cornerstone requirements is Post-Market Surveillance (PMS), a systematic process for monitoring the safety and performance of devices throughout their lifecycle.

But PMS isn’t just about compliance, it’s an opportunity for manufacturers to drive continuous improvement, enhance patient safety, and innovate smarter solutions. In this article, we explore how leveraging PMS data can transform the way medical devices are developed, monitored, and improved.

What is Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) under EU MDR?

Post-Market Surveillance is a proactive process that requires manufacturers to collect, analyse, and act on data related to their medical devices after they are placed on the market. The goal is to ensure ongoing safety, performance, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Under the EU MDR, PMS is no longer a passive activity, it’s a dynamic, integral part of the device lifecycle.

Key components of PMS include:

  • Monitoring device performance in real-world settings
  • Collecting data from various sources (e.g., customer feedback, adverse event reports, clinical studies)
  • Identifying and mitigating risks
  • Updating clinical evaluations and technical documentation

Why PMS Data is a goldmine for Continuous Improvement

PMS data isn’t just a regulatory checkbox; it’s a valuable resource for driving innovation and improvement. Here’s how manufacturers can leverage this data to stay ahead:

  • Identifying Trends and Patterns
    PMS data helps manufacturers spot recurring issues, such as device malfunctions, safety concerns, or user errors. By analysing these trends, companies can make targeted improvements to device design, labelling, or instructions for use, ultimately enhancing user experience and patient outcomes.
  • Updating Clinical Evaluations
    The EU MDR requires ongoing clinical evaluations to ensure that the device’s safety and performance claims remain valid. PMS data provides real-world evidence that can be used to update clinical evaluations, ensuring they reflect the latest safety and performance from real-world device use.
  • Enhancing Risk Management
    PMS data feeds directly into a manufacturer’s risk management system. By continuously monitoring and analysing this data, companies can identify new risks, reassess existing ones, and implement corrective actions to mitigate potential harm.
  • Driving Innovation
    Insights from PMS data can inspire the development of next-generation devices or improvements to existing products. For example, real-world evidence might reveal new use cases or highlight opportunities to expand the device’s target patient population.
  • Strengthening Regulatory Compliance
    PMS data is essential for meeting MDR requirements, such as preparing Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) or Post-Market Surveillance Reports (PMSRs). These documents demonstrate a manufacturer’s commitment to ongoing safety and compliance, building trust with regulators and stakeholders.

Conclusion: The strategic advantage of PMS

The EU MDR’s emphasis on Post-Market Surveillance represents a paradigm shift in how medical devices are regulated and improved. By leveraging PMS data, manufacturers can not only meet regulatory requirements but also drive continuous improvement, enhance patient safety, and foster innovation.

In an increasingly data-driven world, PMS is no longer just a compliance obligation, it’s a strategic advantage. Companies that embrace this approach will be better positioned to deliver safer, more effective devices and build trust with regulators, healthcare providers, and patients alike.

Are you ready to harness the power of PMS data for continuous improvement? Contact us today to learn how we can help you build a robust PMS system that drives innovation and ensures compliance with the EU MDR.

Related articles

  1. Collage art showing a pair of binoculars, an analogy for surveillance.

    How EU MDR Post Market Surveillance differs from FDA post-market expectations

    We compare manufacturer-specific post-market obligations across both regulatory systems.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  2. An arrow arcs from the US over to Europe.

    How EU device classification differs from the US - Are you Prepared?

    Did you know an FDA Class II medical device could be immediately considered as a high-risk Class III device under European Union regulations?

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer
  3. A magnifying glass inspecting a number of wooden cubes with question marks upon them laid upon a blue table. The wooden cube under the magnifying glass has a lightbulb painted on it.

    Fixing the MDR and IVDR? The Commission’s Proposed Amendments and What They Mean for Manufacturers

    Exploring the key elements of this proposal.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  4. An illustration showing a business woman pole-vaulting across a ravine.

    Eliminating the Top 5 Notified Body Gaps in Clinical Evaluation Through Pre-Submission Review

    From insufficient clinical evidence to Post-Market issues - we guide you past common NB deficiencies.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  5. Two arms point at a sign and hold a question mark, in an abstract pop-art style.

    Regulatory Reset? The EU’s Proposed Changes to MDR and IVDR Explained

    Changes published in December 2025 aim to streamline EU medical device and in vitro diagnostics. We explain who is impacted and how.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  6. A pair of glasses rests on an eye test chart.

    Did You Know Your Glasses Were a Medical Device? A Regulatory Guide for Manufacturers

    The importance of correct classification and our recommended path to avoid common ophthalmic device 'gotchas'.

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer
  7. A man sitting whilst a nurse prepares his arm for an injection.

    Why Clinical Trial Design Should Begin at the Earliest Stages of Medical Device Development

    In this guest post from our partners at Franklyn Health, they explore the benefits of a well-planned approach.

    Rob Bedford Rob Bedford Head of Clinical Operations at Franklyn Health
  8. A precariously balanced pile of ping-pong balls and wooden bars.

    The Shift from MDD to MDR: Key Differences in Demonstrating Equivalence

    This transition has demanded that device safety must be demonstrated with more evidence. We offer tips for winning equivalence claims.

    Kamiya Crabtree Kamiya Crabtree Regulatory Medical Writer
  9. A pen and notepad, resting on a laptop.

    Periodic Safety Update Report: Requirements under EU MDR

    Post-Market Surveillance has become more stringent. We help you to understand what manufacturers need to consider.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  10. An EU flag on a pole flies between two US flags against a blue sky.

    Webinar: From USA to Europe - Accelerating Your Path to the Medical Device Market

    We showed you how to quickly transform your U.S. regulatory work into a compliant EU MDR submission.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  11. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Paul Hercock.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: Common Pitfalls & Useful Resources

    Part 5 - In the final video from this series, we explore five major pitfalls that often derail clinical evaluations.

    Paul Hercock Paul Hercock Chief Executive Officer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP