What is Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP)?

Sandra Gopinath
A doctor reading an SSCP document with a patient

In this article, we provide a brief overview of the Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) process, a regulatory requirement applicable for high-risk implantable and class III devices under the EU MDR.

What is Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP)?

The Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is an entirely new document requirement introduced by the MDR. According to article 32 of the MDR regulation (MDR (EU) 2017/745), manufacturers are required to produce an SSCP for high risk implantable and class III medical devices (except custom-made or investigational devices).

An SSCP is unique in its structure and format. It is written specifically for medical device end users, including both healthcare professionals and, if applicable, patients. If the SSCP contains information for both healthcare professionals and patients, the document should include distinct and easily identifiable sections for each audience.

All SSCPs are required to be submitted to a recognised notified body for validation. Unlike other technical documents, the SSCP will be published for public access in the EUDAMED database by the notified body after validation.

When do you need an SSCP and what are its objectives?

If you are a manufacturer of high-risk implantable devices, such as an arterial stent or vitreous implant, or class III devices such as breast implants or total or partial joint replacements, and wish to comply with the MDR (EU) 2017/745, you must produce an SSCP for your devices.

The main objective of the SSCP is to provide clinical data and other information concerning the safety and clinical effectiveness of the medical device and to make it accessible to the general public in an appropriate form. This will allow healthcare professionals to make more informed decisions about patient treatment, and enable the patients to look into the devices recommended by their healthcare providers.

The SSCP must summarise both favourable and unfavourable data regarding the safety and clinical effectiveness of the device; that is, it is meant not only to demonstrate that the device is safe and effective, but also to highlight residual risks and potential safety or performance concerns and how these have been mitigated.

However, the SSCP is not intended to be used in place of the IFU or implant cards associated with the medical device. It is also not meant to provide comprehensive advice on the diagnosis and treatment of specific medical conditions. The public access of SSCP via EUDAMED will also enable users to form a direct comparison of the subject device and similar alternative devices based on available clinical evidence.

What support is available when writing an SSCP?

Being a publicly available document and an entirely new requirement under the MDR, the SSCP may present challenges to the manufacturers. It is important to become familiar with official guidance such as that published in MDCG-2019-9 Rev 1.

However, as a new document type, it is also advisable to consider seeking professional advice and consulting support. Mantra Systems offers a complete SSCP service as part of our MDR consulting support (including writing and readability testing), alongside a range of training resources and templates through the EnableCE platform.

If you have any questions about SSCPs and our range of support services, contact our team for a free, no obligation discussion.

Related articles

  1. A precariously balanced pile of ping-pong balls and wooden bars.

    The Shift from MDD to MDR: Key Differences in Demonstrating Equivalence

    This transition has demanded that device safety must be demonstrated with more evidence. We offer tips for winning equivalence claims.

    Kamiya Crabtree Kamiya Crabtree Regulatory Medical Writer
  2. A pen and notepad, resting on a laptop.

    Periodic Safety Update Report: Requirements under EU MDR

    Post-Market Surveillance has become more stringent. We help you to understand what manufacturers need to consider.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  3. An EU flag on a pole flies between two US flags against a blue sky.

    Webinar: From USA to Europe - Accelerating Your Path to the Medical Device Market

    We showed you how to quickly transform your U.S. regulatory work into a compliant EU MDR submission.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  4. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Paul Hercock.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: Common Pitfalls & Useful Resources

    Part 5 - In the final video from this series, we explore five major pitfalls that often derail clinical evaluations.

    Dr Paul Hercock Dr Paul Hercock Chief Executive Officer
  5. A US-style 'changes ahead' warning road sign.

    Device Modifications: When a Simple Change Becomes a Regulatory Nightmare

    As regulatory consultants we understand how minor modifications to a device can often cause disproportionate disruption.

    Kamiya Crabtree Kamiya Crabtree Regulatory Medical Writer
  6. Webinar announcement poster.

    Webinar: Regulatory & Cybersecurity Essentials for medical device software and AI-enabled devices

    Our webinar with Cyber Alchemy addressed bringing AI-enabled medical devices to market with both the right regulatory and cybersecurity foundations.

    Shen May Khoo Shen May Khoo Regulatory Project Lead
  7. A simple jigsaw with iconography representing growth printed on it.

    Leveraging Post-Market Surveillance Data for Continuous Improvement

    PMS isn’t just about compliance, it’s an opportunity for improvement, enhance patient safety & innovate.

    Shen May Khoo Shen May Khoo Regulatory Project Lead
  8. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. W. Brambley.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: CEP Strategy & CER Structure

    Part 4 - We explore how these guide reviewers through the evidence that supports safey, performance, and conformity.

    Dr Will Brambley Dr Will Brambley Lead Medical Writer
  9. A checklist being ticket-off in pen.

    The Critical Role of Pre-Submission Reviews in EU MDR Clinical Evaluations

    Ensuring your CER is robust and aligned with current standards is critical. How much Clinical Evidence is enough?

    Sandra Gopinath Sandra Gopinath Chief Regulatory Officer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP