Implementing Master UDI-DIs: Key Insights from MDCG 2025-7

Dr Will Brambley
A vision testing device.

The latest guidance from the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG), published as MDCG 2025-7, introduces the implementation of Master Unique Device Identification - Device Identifiers (UDI-DIs) for a number of highly individualised devices.

The use of a Master UDI-DI aims to strengthen and enhance the traceability and recording of UDIs. Master UDI-Ds allow the grouping of highly individualised devices with specific design similarities under a common identifier to be assigned and registered on Eudamed. This should effectively eliminate the need for a manufacturer to have dozens if not hundreds of UDI-DIs for very similar devices by unifying them under one Master UDI-DI.

Devices Addressed by MDCG 2025-7

The devices covered by this guidance are:

  • Contact lenses
  • Spectacle frames
  • Spectacle lenses
  • Reading spectacles

According to MDCG 2021-24:

  • Corrective contact lenses are classified as Class IIa (short-term use) or Class IIb (long-term use) medical devices.
  • Spectacle frames, spectacle lenses, and reading spectacles are classified as Class I medical devices.

Implementation Deadlines

MDCG 2025-7 aims to clarify the timelines of implementation of Master UDI-DIs for these devices, as well as the obligations of manufacturers relating to Eudamed and vigilance reporting.

Key dates include:

  • Manufacturers must place UDI carriers on the label of a device and on all higher levels of packaging for Class I devices from 26 May 2025
  • Manufacturers must use the UDI/Device registration module in Eudamed by Q1 2026
  • Master UDI-DIs become mandatory for contact lenses from 9 November 2026
  • Master UDI-Dis become mandatory for spectacle lenses and reading glasses from September 2028
  • If a manufacturer has assigned a Master UDI-DI to a device before Q1 2026, they must use it for vigilance reporting.

Moving Forward with Master UDI-DIs

The introduction of Master UDI-DIs marks a step forward in improving the traceability and administrative workload of highly individualised medical devices. By allowing manufacturers to group similar products under a single identifier, the guidance aims to reduce burden while maintaining safety and compliance standards. Manufacturers of these devices should take note of the implementation timelines and obligations, particularly around Eudamed registration and vigilance reporting, to ensure that they can prepare effectively for full compliance.

Related articles

  1. US and EU flags on poles alongside each other.

    Clinical Evidence under EU MDR: Leveraging FDA Clinical Data to Streamline EU MDR Compliance

    FDA approval alone is not sufficient for European market access - a theme we explore futher in this article and the accompanying webinar.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  2. An AI-generated image of 3 people in an office in front of a whiteboard with the words 'Medical Device Market Entry Strategy' written above a world map.

    EU MDR & NHS DTAC Cybersecurity Requirements for UK Market Entry

    This guest article from our partner Cyber Alchemy shows you how to build cybersecurity evidence for the EU MDR and NHS DTAC.

    Luke Hill Luke Hill Co-Founder of Cyber Alchemy
  3. An illustration showing a GPS-driven navigation route superimposed upon someone using a laptop.

    Where to Launch First? A MedTech Founder's Regulatory Roadmap to the EU, UK and US

    Cyber Alchemy × Mantra Systems — Episode 1: All three markets operate under different regulatory systems and place different demands on manufacturers.

    Ronghe Xu Ronghe Xu Regulatory Medical Writer & Strategic BD Lead China
  4. A woman uses an inhaler.

    Navigating EU MDR Article 117: A Practical Guide to Drug-Device Combination Product Submissions

    Implementation of the EU MDR 2017/745 has brought significant changes.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  5. Collage art showing a pair of binoculars, an analogy for surveillance.

    How EU MDR Post Market Surveillance differs from FDA post-market expectations

    We compare manufacturer-specific post-market obligations across both regulatory systems.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  6. An arrow arcs from the US over to Europe.

    How EU device classification differs from the US - Are you Prepared?

    Did you know an FDA Class II medical device could be immediately considered as a high-risk Class III device under European Union regulations?

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer
  7. A magnifying glass inspecting a number of wooden cubes with question marks upon them laid upon a blue table. The wooden cube under the magnifying glass has a lightbulb painted on it.

    Fixing the MDR and IVDR? The Commission’s Proposed Amendments and What They Mean for Manufacturers

    Exploring the key elements of this proposal.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  8. Two arms point at a sign and hold a question mark, in an abstract pop-art style.

    Regulatory Reset? The EU’s Proposed Changes to MDR and IVDR Explained

    Changes published in December 2025 aim to streamline EU medical device and in vitro diagnostics. We explain who is impacted and how.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  9. A pair of glasses rests on an eye test chart.

    Did You Know Your Glasses Were a Medical Device? A Regulatory Guide for Manufacturers

    The importance of correct classification and our recommended path to avoid common ophthalmic device 'gotchas'.

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP