Post-Market Surveillance (PMS): Understanding PMCF & Vigilance under the EU MDR

Ronghe Xu
  • By Ronghe Xu
  • Regulatory Medical Writer & Strategic BD Lead China
Some binocular-hand eyes as an analogy for surveillance.

Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) is defined as a structured process for monitoring the safety and performance of a medical device following its release onto the market. PMS consists of two key components: Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) and Vigilance.

Although they may look similar, they serve distinct purposes and have different methodologies under the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) framework. Here’s the breakdown of each:

1. Purpose

PMCF

The primary purpose of PMCF is to collect clinical data after a device is on the market to confirm its safety and performance in the real-world population as per its intended use. PMCF aims to provide ongoing clinical evidence of the device’s effectiveness and detect any emerging clinical risks.

It is part of the clinical evaluation process and is used to update the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) to ensure that the benefit-risk profile of the device remains acceptable over the device lifetime.

Vigilance

Vigilance refers to the process of monitoring, detecting, and reporting adverse events or incidents involving a medical device after it has been placed on the market. The purpose of vigilance is to identify serious incidents or potentially harmful events that may occur with the device to implement corrective actions and minimise risks to patients and users.

2. Scope and Methods

PMCF

PMCF is a proactive process focused on collecting clinical data related to the performance and safety of the device. it often involves conducting clinical studies (ongoing trials or post-market clinical studies), gathering data from registries, reviewing clinical literature, or following up with healthcare providers to collect clinical insights and evaluate ongoing clinical performance and risks.

PMCF is specifically designed to provide evidence for ongoing clinical evaluation.

Vigilance

Vigilance is a reactive process with a broader scope. It is triggered by adverse events or reported incidents and encompasses all aspects of device safety. It includes identifying issues such as injuries, infections, device malfunctions, or failures that could pose safety risks.

3. Regulatory Reporting

PMCF

PMCF is a planned, systematic activity documented in a PMCF Plan, which outlines objectives, methodology, and timelines for clinical follow-up.

Results are reported through PMCF Reports and included in the Post-Market Surveillance Report (PMSR) or Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR), which summarize the device’s safety and performance based on PMS activities.

Vigilance

Vigilance involves mandatory reporting of serious incidents and device failures to the relevant competent authorities in the EU. Manufacturers are required to report incidents through the European Medical Device Vigilance System (EUDAMED) or directly to the competent authorities.

Vigilance activities are often triggered by adverse event reports from users, healthcare professionals, or consumers, and the manufacturer must investigate and, if necessary, implement corrective or preventive actions (CAPA). The summary of the vigilance activities and CAPA will be included in Post-Market Surveillance Report (PMSR) or the PSUR, depending on the risk classification of the device.

2. Outcome and Actions

PMCF

The outcomes of PMCF help update the Clinical Evaluation Report and support the ongoing clinical benefit-risk analysis.

Also, if new clinical risks are identified, PMCF findings may lead to updates in labelling, device modifications, or additional clinical investigations.

Vigilance

The outcome of vigilance activities may include the recall of a device, the issuance of Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCA), or warnings about the device’s safety issues. Vigilance findings are often linked to risk mitigation and corrective actions to ensure patient safety.

Focus Clinical data collection to evaluate safety and performance Monitoring and reporting safety incidents and adverse events
Scope Clinical performance and risks Safety incidents (e.g., malfunction, adverse events)
Approach Prospective (clinical studies, registries) Reactive (triggered by reported incidents)
Methodology Clinical follow-up, post-market studies Adverse event reporting, trend analysis
Reporting PMCF Report, PMSR/PSUR, Clinical Evaluation Report Reporting to regulatory authorities, PMSR/PSUR, Clinical Evaluation Report
Outcome Update Clinical Evaluation, support CER, identify emerging risks Corrective actions, device recall, safety measures

Key takeaways

PMCF is a proactive clinical follow-up activity that focuses on gathering clinical data to support ongoing evaluation of the device’s safety and performance.

Vigilance is a reactive safety monitoring system focused on identifying and reporting adverse events and device malfunctions to ensure the safety of patients using the device.

Both are essential components of the PMS system, but they address different aspects of post-market monitoring and serve different regulatory and safety objectives. Mantra Systems are well-equipped to advise on all aspects of MDR work, so get in touch now if you need help.

Related articles

  1. Collage art showing a pair of binoculars, an analogy for surveillance.

    How EU MDR Post Market Surveillance differs from FDA post-market expectations

    We compare manufacturer-specific post-market obligations across both regulatory systems.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  2. An arrow arcs from the US over to Europe.

    How EU device classification differs from the US - Are you Prepared?

    Did you know an FDA Class II medical device could be immediately considered as a high-risk Class III device under European Union regulations?

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer
  3. A magnifying glass inspecting a number of wooden cubes with question marks upon them laid upon a blue table. The wooden cube under the magnifying glass has a lightbulb painted on it.

    Fixing the MDR and IVDR? The Commission’s Proposed Amendments and What They Mean for Manufacturers

    Exploring the key elements of this proposal.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  4. Two arms point at a sign and hold a question mark, in an abstract pop-art style.

    Regulatory Reset? The EU’s Proposed Changes to MDR and IVDR Explained

    Changes published in December 2025 aim to streamline EU medical device and in vitro diagnostics. We explain who is impacted and how.

    Dr Gayle Buchel Dr Gayle Buchel Chief Medical Writer
  5. A pair of glasses rests on an eye test chart.

    Did You Know Your Glasses Were a Medical Device? A Regulatory Guide for Manufacturers

    The importance of correct classification and our recommended path to avoid common ophthalmic device 'gotchas'.

    Gabriela Cardoso Gabriela Cardoso Regulatory Medical Writer
  6. A precariously balanced pile of ping-pong balls and wooden bars.

    The Shift from MDD to MDR: Key Differences in Demonstrating Equivalence

    This transition has demanded that device safety must be demonstrated with more evidence. We offer tips for winning equivalence claims.

    Kamiya Crabtree Kamiya Crabtree Regulatory Medical Writer
  7. A pen and notepad, resting on a laptop.

    Periodic Safety Update Report: Requirements under EU MDR

    Post-Market Surveillance has become more stringent. We help you to understand what manufacturers need to consider.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  8. An EU flag on a pole flies between two US flags against a blue sky.

    Webinar: From USA to Europe - Accelerating Your Path to the Medical Device Market

    We showed you how to quickly transform your U.S. regulatory work into a compliant EU MDR submission.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  9. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Paul Hercock.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: Common Pitfalls & Useful Resources

    Part 5 - In the final video from this series, we explore five major pitfalls that often derail clinical evaluations.

    Paul Hercock Paul Hercock Chief Executive Officer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP