Post-Market Surveillance (PMS): Understanding PMCF & Vigilance under the EU MDR

Ronghe Xu
  • By Ronghe Xu
  • Regulatory Medical Writer & Strategic BD Lead China
Some binocular-hand eyes as an analogy for surveillance.

Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) is defined as a structured process for monitoring the safety and performance of a medical device following its release onto the market. PMS consists of two key components: Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) and Vigilance.

Although they may look similar, they serve distinct purposes and have different methodologies under the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) framework. Here’s the breakdown of each:

1. Purpose

PMCF

The primary purpose of PMCF is to collect clinical data after a device is on the market to confirm its safety and performance in the real-world population as per its intended use. PMCF aims to provide ongoing clinical evidence of the device’s effectiveness and detect any emerging clinical risks.

It is part of the clinical evaluation process and is used to update the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) to ensure that the benefit-risk profile of the device remains acceptable over the device lifetime.

Vigilance

Vigilance refers to the process of monitoring, detecting, and reporting adverse events or incidents involving a medical device after it has been placed on the market. The purpose of vigilance is to identify serious incidents or potentially harmful events that may occur with the device to implement corrective actions and minimise risks to patients and users.

2. Scope and Methods

PMCF

PMCF is a proactive process focused on collecting clinical data related to the performance and safety of the device. it often involves conducting clinical studies (ongoing trials or post-market clinical studies), gathering data from registries, reviewing clinical literature, or following up with healthcare providers to collect clinical insights and evaluate ongoing clinical performance and risks.

PMCF is specifically designed to provide evidence for ongoing clinical evaluation.

Vigilance

Vigilance is a reactive process with a broader scope. It is triggered by adverse events or reported incidents and encompasses all aspects of device safety. It includes identifying issues such as injuries, infections, device malfunctions, or failures that could pose safety risks.

3. Regulatory Reporting

PMCF

PMCF is a planned, systematic activity documented in a PMCF Plan, which outlines objectives, methodology, and timelines for clinical follow-up.

Results are reported through PMCF Reports and included in the Post-Market Surveillance Report (PMSR) or Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR), which summarize the device’s safety and performance based on PMS activities.

Vigilance

Vigilance involves mandatory reporting of serious incidents and device failures to the relevant competent authorities in the EU. Manufacturers are required to report incidents through the European Medical Device Vigilance System (EUDAMED) or directly to the competent authorities.

Vigilance activities are often triggered by adverse event reports from users, healthcare professionals, or consumers, and the manufacturer must investigate and, if necessary, implement corrective or preventive actions (CAPA). The summary of the vigilance activities and CAPA will be included in Post-Market Surveillance Report (PMSR) or the PSUR, depending on the risk classification of the device.

2. Outcome and Actions

PMCF

The outcomes of PMCF help update the Clinical Evaluation Report and support the ongoing clinical benefit-risk analysis.

Also, if new clinical risks are identified, PMCF findings may lead to updates in labelling, device modifications, or additional clinical investigations.

Vigilance

The outcome of vigilance activities may include the recall of a device, the issuance of Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCA), or warnings about the device’s safety issues. Vigilance findings are often linked to risk mitigation and corrective actions to ensure patient safety.

Focus Clinical data collection to evaluate safety and performance Monitoring and reporting safety incidents and adverse events
Scope Clinical performance and risks Safety incidents (e.g., malfunction, adverse events)
Approach Prospective (clinical studies, registries) Reactive (triggered by reported incidents)
Methodology Clinical follow-up, post-market studies Adverse event reporting, trend analysis
Reporting PMCF Report, PMSR/PSUR, Clinical Evaluation Report Reporting to regulatory authorities, PMSR/PSUR, Clinical Evaluation Report
Outcome Update Clinical Evaluation, support CER, identify emerging risks Corrective actions, device recall, safety measures

Key takeaways

PMCF is a proactive clinical follow-up activity that focuses on gathering clinical data to support ongoing evaluation of the device’s safety and performance.

Vigilance is a reactive safety monitoring system focused on identifying and reporting adverse events and device malfunctions to ensure the safety of patients using the device.

Both are essential components of the PMS system, but they address different aspects of post-market monitoring and serve different regulatory and safety objectives. Mantra Systems are well-equipped to advise on all aspects of MDR work, so get in touch now if you need help.

Related articles

  1. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Paul Hercock.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: Common Pitfalls & Useful Resources

    Part 5 - In the final video from this series, we explore five major pitfalls that often derail clinical evaluations.

    Dr Paul Hercock Dr Paul Hercock Chief Executive Officer
  2. An EU flag on a pole flies between two US flags against a blue sky.

    Webinar: From USA to Europe - Accelerating Your Path to the Medical Device Market

    Join us on the 9th December 2025 to learn how to quickly transform your U.S. regulatory work into a compliant EU MDR submission.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  3. A US-style 'changes ahead' warning road sign.

    Device Modifications: When a Simple Change Becomes a Regulatory Nightmare

    As regulatory consultants we understand how minor modifications to a device can often cause disproportionate disruption.

    Kamiya Crabtree Kamiya Crabtree Regulatory Medical Writer
  4. Webinar announcement poster.

    Webinar: Regulatory & Cybersecurity Essentials for medical device software and AI-enabled devices

    Our webinar with Cyber Alchemy addressed bringing AI-enabled medical devices to market with both the right regulatory and cybersecurity foundations.

    Shen May Khoo Shen May Khoo Regulatory Project Lead
  5. A simple jigsaw with iconography representing growth printed on it.

    Leveraging Post-Market Surveillance Data for Continuous Improvement

    PMS isn’t just about compliance, it’s an opportunity for improvement, enhance patient safety & innovate.

    Shen May Khoo Shen May Khoo Regulatory Project Lead
  6. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. W. Brambley.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: CEP Strategy & CER Structure

    Part 4 - We explore how these guide reviewers through the evidence that supports safey, performance, and conformity.

    Dr Will Brambley Dr Will Brambley Lead Medical Writer
  7. A checklist being ticket-off in pen.

    The Critical Role of Pre-Submission Reviews in EU MDR Clinical Evaluations

    Ensuring your CER is robust and aligned with current standards is critical. How much Clinical Evidence is enough?

    Sandra Gopinath Sandra Gopinath Chief Regulatory Officer
  8. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. W. Brambley.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: The State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Literature Review

    Part 3 - This is core of a sucessful submission. Will demystifies the process and explains how it supports clinical evaluation.

    Dr Will Brambley Dr Will Brambley Lead Medical Writer
  9. An orange tabletop with wooden question mark blocks laid upon it.

    Regulatory Update: EU Borderline & Classification Manual for medical devices v4

    New examples sharpen the distinction between medical devices and other product categories, such as pharmacologically active substances and aesthetic-only products.

    Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Chandini Valiya Kizhakkeveetil Regulatory Medical Writer
  10. A poster frame for our Clinical Evaluation video series featuring Dr. P. Boxall.

    Guide to Clinical Evaluation: Clinical Evaluation in Context

    Part 2 - A clinical evaluation demonstrates that a device is safe and effective, but achieving this requires more than simply compiling studies.

    Dr Peter Boxall Dr Peter Boxall Lead Medical Writer

More articles

Need help producing compliant CEPs & CERs? We are offering FREE CEPs to 5 qualifying applicants per week

Get your free CEP